This is a translated page. The original can be found here: http://iwebdevel.com/2009/10/05/os-ram-difference-between-ubuntu-x86-32-bit-with-physical-address-pae-and-ubuntu-x64-64-bit-karmic-koala-jaunty/
UPDATES VIA RSS | Email Posodobitev prek RSS | Email Get updates via feedburner Get updates via twitter
Home / Operating Systems / Ubuntu / OS: RAM difference between U… Domov / Operacijski sistemi / Ubuntu / OS: RAM razlika med U ...

OS: RAM difference between Ubuntu x86 (32 bit with physical address) and Ubuntu x64 (64 bit) OS: RAM razlika med Ubuntu x86 (32 bit z fizični naslov) in Ubuntu x64 (64 bit)

Posted on 05. Objavljeno dne 05. Oct, 2009 by Dragos in Operating Systems , Ubuntu Oktober 2009, ki ga Dragos v Operacijski sistemi, Ubuntu

The first ever version of Ubuntu I have installed on my computer was Hardy Heron 8.04 (x64/64 bit). Prva različica Ubuntu imam umestiti naprej svoj računalo was Hardy Heron 8,04 (x64/64 bit). As time passed and new versions appeared, I have upgraded to the latest version of Intrepid Ibex 8.10. Sčasoma in nove različice pojavil, sem nadgradili na najnovejšo različico Intrepid kozorog 8.10. As a web developer, It happens sometimes to run an excessive number of simultaneous applications at a time, which leads to a huge RAM consumption. Kot spletni razvijalec, se včasih zgodi, da delujejo preveliko število sočasnih zahtevkov naenkrat, kar vodi do velike porabe RAM-a. Back then (still the x64 version) 2GB of ram was not enough, only Netbeans consumed 1GB of RAM and Firefox – about 800MB. Takrat (še vedno x64 različica) 2 GB RAM-a ni bilo dovolj, le Netbeans porabljenega 1 GB RAM in Firefox - okoli 800.. Sometimes my computer got frozen and hampered myself from doing my job without interruptions. Včasih imam računalnik zamrzne in ovira sam opravljati svoje delo brez prekinitev. So I added another 2GB of RAM (totaling 4GB). Zato sem dodala še 2 GB RAM-a (v skupni vrednosti 4GB). With that amount, my PC worked very well, better than ever (even though hibernating my PC was taking ages). S tega zneska, svoj PC delala zelo dobro, bolje kot kdaj koli prej (čeprav zimskim spanjem PC-ja je bila ob starosti). Unfortunately, while upgrading to Jaunty Jackalope, it happened a crash during the process, which lead to a total loss of information on my hard-disk (and yes I didn't backup my data Na žalost pa nadgradnja Samouvjeren Jackalope, se je to zgodilo v času nesreče proces, ki vodi do popolne izgube podatkov o mojem trdega diska (in da nisem backup moje podatke :) ). ). The second times I've considered to install Jaunty Jackalope 9.04, but this time the 32 bit version. Drugi časi sem šteje, da namestite Samouvjeren Jackalope 9,04, vendar tokrat 32 bitno različico. I was very surprised to notice that while running the same number of programs (at the same time!), only the 75th part of RAM from the amount of RAM used on the 64 bit system was used on the x86 version. Sem bil zelo presenečen opazil, da med vožnjo enako število programov (ob istem času!), Samo 75. del RAM-a s količino RAM-a se uporabljajo na 64 bitni sistem je bil uporabljen v x86 različici. I was even more surprised to see that while on the 64 system Firefox had the stupid habit of eating too much RAM (~800MB in best cases), on the 32 bit system, Firefox is using only 120MB of RAM, even though it's fully loaded with heavy Javascripted websites (Digg, Facebook or Mashable). Sem bil še toliko bolj presenečeni, da je, medtem ko na 64 sistemu Firefox je neumno navado jesti preveč RAM (~ 800. v najboljšem primeru), na 32 bitni sistem, Firefox uporablja samo 120MB RAM-a, čeprav je pri polni obremenitvi s težko Javascripted spletnih straneh (Digg, Facebook ali Mashable). So, when you doubt of whether to install Ubuntu x86 or x64, keep in mind that the x64 version will deplete your RAM resources. But , from my experience, the x64 version works much, much faster on dual core processors than the x86 version (and that's the only advantage I am currently missing). Torej, ko ste v dvomih, ali želite namestiti Ubuntu x86 ali x64, ne pozabite, da se bo x64 različica tanjšajo vaše RAM virov. Ampak, iz mojih izkušenj, x64 prevod dela še veliko, veliko hitreje na dual core procesorje kot x86 verzija ( in to je edina prednost sem trenutno odsoten). Also keep in mind that if you have more than 3GB installed in your PC, you will have to install the Physical Address extension from the Synaptic Package Manager, cause if you don't do it, the system will recognize only ~3.4GB of RAM from the total amount of RAM. Prav tako ne pozabite, da če imate več kot 3GB nameščen v računalnik, boste morali namestiti Physical podaljšanje Naslov Synaptic Package Manager, vzrok, če ne boste storili, bo sistem prepozna samo ~ 3.4GB RAM-a od skupnega zneska RAM-a.

Translate this post Prevedi to post


Related posts: Podobni objav:

  1. Ubuntu: How to upgrade from Ubuntu Jaunty Jackalope 9.04 to Ubuntu Karmic Koala 9.10 Ubuntu: Kako nadgradim Ubuntu Samouvjeren Jackalope 9,04 do 9,10 Ubuntu karmični Koala
  2. Apps: Firefox 3.5 uses less ram than ever! Apps: Firefox 3,5 porabi manj ram kot kdajkoli! Kudos to Mozilla developers Sloves v Mozilla razvijalce
  3. Ubuntu: nVidia card slow? Ubuntu: nVidia kartico počasi? Monitor flickers? Monitor utripa? Try this fix and boost graphic card performance! Poskusite to popraviti in povečanje zmogljivosti grafične kartice!
  4. Acid3 Test: Best browser performance Opera 10 beta 2. Acid3 Test: najboljši brskalnik Opera 10 beta uspešnost 2. Firefox 3.5.3 and Epiphany 2.26.1 slightly fail Firefox 3.5.3 in 2.26.1 Epiphany rahlo ne
  5. Ubuntu hacks: Extend visual effects in compiz. Ubuntu hacks: razširitev vizualnih učinkov v compiz. More settings, more fun Več nastavitev, bolj zabavno

    blog comments powered by Disqus blog comments powered by Disqus