This is a translated page. The original can be found here: http://iwebdevel.com/2009/10/05/os-ram-difference-between-ubuntu-x86-32-bit-with-physical-address-pae-and-ubuntu-x64-64-bit-karmic-koala-jaunty/
UPDATES VIA RSS | Email AĠĠORNAMENTI VIA RSS | Email Get updates via feedburner Get updates via twitter
Home / Operating Systems / Ubuntu / OS: RAM difference between U… Home / Operating Systems / Ubuntu / OS: differenza bejn RAM U ...

OS: RAM difference between Ubuntu x86 (32 bit with physical address) and Ubuntu x64 (64 bit) OS: differenza bejn RAM Ubuntu x86 (32 bit bl-indirizz fiżiku) u l-Ubuntu x64 (64 bit)

Posted on 05. Posted on 05. Oct, 2009 by Dragos in Operating Systems , Ubuntu Ottubru, 2009 mill Dragos fl-Operating Systems, Ubuntu

The first ever version of Ubuntu I have installed on my computer was Hardy Heron 8.04 (x64/64 bit). L-ewwel verżjoni ta 'l-Ubuntu I jkollhom installat fil-kompjuter tiegħi kien Hardy Heron 8,04 (x64/64 bit). As time passed and new versions appeared, I have upgraded to the latest version of Intrepid Ibex 8.10. Bħala ħin għadda u verżjonijiet ġodda deher, I għollew l-aħħar verżjoni ta 'Intrepid Ibex 8.10. As a web developer, It happens sometimes to run an excessive number of simultaneous applications at a time, which leads to a huge RAM consumption. Bħala iżviluppatur web, Dan jiġri kultant li jiddekorri numru eċċessiv ta 'applikazzjonijiet simultanji fi żmien, li twassal għal konsum RAM enormi. Back then (still the x64 version) 2GB of ram was not enough, only Netbeans consumed 1GB of RAM and Firefox – about 800MB. Back imbagħad (għadha l-verżjoni x64) 2GB tal-muntun ma kienx biżżejjed, Netbeans biss ikkunsmati 1GB ta 'RAM u Firefox - madwar 800MB. Sometimes my computer got frozen and hampered myself from doing my job without interruptions. Kultant kompjuter tiegħi ltqajna myself iffriżati u mxekkla milli jagħmlu xogħol tiegħi mingħajr interruzzjonijiet. So I added another 2GB of RAM (totaling 4GB). So I 2GB ieħor miżjud ta 'RAM (jlaħħaq total 4GB). With that amount, my PC worked very well, better than ever (even though hibernating my PC was taking ages). Ma 'dak l-ammont, PC tiegħi ħadem tajjeb ħafna, aħjar minn qatt qabel (anke jekk hibernating PC tiegħi kien qed età). Unfortunately, while upgrading to Jaunty Jackalope, it happened a crash during the process, which lead to a total loss of information on my hard-disk (and yes I didn't backup my data Sfortunatament, filwaqt li t-titjib li Jaunty Jackalope, dan ġara crash matul il-proċess, li jwassal għal telf totali ta 'informazzjoni dwar il-hard disk tiegħi (u iva I ma backup data tiegħi :) ). ). The second times I've considered to install Jaunty Jackalope 9.04, but this time the 32 bit version. Il-ħinijiet tieni stajt kkunsidrati li jinstallaw Jaunty Jackalope 9.04, iżda din id-darba l-verżjoni 32 bit. I was very surprised to notice that while running the same number of programs (at the same time!), only the 75th part of RAM from the amount of RAM used on the 64 bit system was used on the x86 version. I kien ferm sorpriż li l-avviż li waqt li tmexxi l-istess numru ta 'programmi (fl-istess ħin!), Il-parti biss 75 sena ta RAM mill-ammont ta' RAM użati fuq is-sistema bit 64 ma kinitx użat fuq il-verżjoni x86. I was even more surprised to see that while on the 64 system Firefox had the stupid habit of eating too much RAM (~800MB in best cases), on the 32 bit system, Firefox is using only 120MB of RAM, even though it's fully loaded with heavy Javascripted websites (Digg, Facebook or Mashable). I kien saħansitra aktar sorpriż li tara li filwaqt li fuq il-Firefox 64 sistema kellhom l-vizzju ta 'stupid RAM tiekol wisq (~ 800MB f'każijiet aħjar), dwar is-sistema 32 bit, Firefox huwa bl-użu biss ta' RAM 120MB, minkejja li huwa kompletament mgħobbija mal-websajts Javascripted tqal (Digg, Facebook jew Mashable). So, when you doubt of whether to install Ubuntu x86 or x64, keep in mind that the x64 version will deplete your RAM resources. But , from my experience, the x64 version works much, much faster on dual core processors than the x86 version (and that's the only advantage I am currently missing). Allura, meta inti dubju dwar jekk biex jinstallaw Ubuntu x86 jew x64, iżomm f'moħħu li l-verżjoni x64 se jnaqqsu r-riżorsi RAM tiegħek. Iżda, mill-esperjenza tiegħi, il-verżjoni x64 xogħlijiet ħafna, ħafna aktar mgħaġġla fuq il-proċessuri ewlenin doppja mill-verżjoni x86 ( u dak l-uniku vantaġġ I am bħalissa tkun nieqsa). Also keep in mind that if you have more than 3GB installed in your PC, you will have to install the Physical Address extension from the Synaptic Package Manager, cause if you don't do it, the system will recognize only ~3.4GB of RAM from the total amount of RAM. Wkoll wieħed iżomm f'moħħu li jekk għandek aktar minn 3GB installati fil-kompjuter tiegħek, inti ser ikollok tinstalla l-estensjoni Indirizz Fiżika mill-Maniġer tal-Pakkett sinapsi, kawża jekk inti ma tagħmel dan, is-sistema se jirrikonoxxu biss ~ 3.4GB ta 'l-RAM mill-ammont totali ta 'RAM.

Translate this post Ittraduċi din il-kariga


Related posts: Related postijiet:

  1. Ubuntu: How to upgrade from Ubuntu Jaunty Jackalope 9.04 to Ubuntu Karmic Koala 9.10 Ubuntu: Kif taġġorna minn Ubuntu Jaunty Jackalope 9.04 għall-Ubuntu Karmic Koala 9.10
  2. Apps: Firefox 3.5 uses less ram than ever! Apps: Firefox 3.5 użi muntun inqas minn qatt qabel! Kudos to Mozilla developers Kudos biex Mozilla iżviluppaturi
  3. Ubuntu hacks: Extend visual effects in compiz. Hacks Ubuntu: Testendi l-effetti viżwali fl-Compiz. More settings, more fun Aktar settings, aktar divertenti
  4. Ubuntu: How to check hard disk healthiness based on SMART data (Karmic Koala) Ubuntu: Kif jiċċekkjaw hard disk tajjeb għas-saħħa bbażati fuq data SMART (Karmic Koala)
  5. Firefox 3.5: The web is not ready! Firefox 3.5: Il-web mhix lesta!

    blog comments powered by Disqus blog kummenti powered by Disqus